1.我們應該如何做去減少碳排放
在歐洲,要求飛機乘客負擔與排放量相應的費用,已成 為一種比較普遍的做法。
在發展中的中國,“碳足跡”的補 償行動雖然還沒有被強行要求,但已有越來越多的人開始積 極和主動地參與其中,倡導“低碳”的生活。他們選擇使用 節能設備、不用的電器隨時關掉電源、購買本地的有機蔬菜 和衣物、盡量少開車……在生活細節上時時刻刻注意節能減 耗,以減少二氧化碳的排放量。
甚至越來越多的人采用環保 型的婚禮,以植樹作為他們贈送給彼此的禮物,且“零碳旅 游”的概念也逐漸成為人們追捧的新生活方式。中國首家 “碳中性”酒店URBN Hotels在上海開張,它在營運過程中 隨時記錄酒店的能源消耗量,包括員工交通、飲食輸送以及 每位賓客使用的能源,以計算“碳足跡”,并做出相應的補 償措施。
顧客也會在享受假期閑適生活的同時,為減少二氧 化碳等溫室氣體的排放而做出自己的貢獻。你有想過自己應該如何為碳埋單嗎?氣候變化絕不只是 環保主義者的問題,而是與我們每個人都息息相關的。
也許 舉手之勞就可以減輕你的“碳足跡”,節能也好、種樹也好、付費也好,就讓我們一起行動起來,為地球母親擦去自己的 “碳足跡”吧。
2.全球變暖低炭生活減少二氧化碳排放作貢獻英語作文
The Low-carbon Economic
Nowadays,with more and more serious problems such as the increasing global temperture,the melting ice and the rising sea-levering,people are recognizing the important of developing the low-carbon economic now.
There are many ways we can do to reach the loe-carbon *y,discovering others fuels which is more clean and more green to instead of the using of *ly, we should have the save-energy conscious and do something which we ca穿觸扁吠壯杜憋森鉑緝n make,for instance,using the bus ranther than car when you go out,re-use the thing that can be recycle used,reducing the use of plastic * but not least,we should plant more trees or other greenplants,in which way we can not only improve the environment,but also can make our home more beauty.
In my opnion, the most important thing to reach the low-carbon economic is everyone must try their best do what they can do for * everyone have the sence of low-carbon economic and have the action by themselves ,it will be earlier to reach it.
3.英文的低碳句子
面對氣候問題,中國民間環保組織開始呼吁選擇低碳生活方式,減少碳足跡。
China's environmental organisations have started to advocate low-carbon lifestyles and the reduction of carbon footprints to help combat climate change.
與此同時,貧窮國家也可以獲得低碳技術,否則它們將負擔不起。
Poor nations meanwhile could gain access to low-carbon technology which they could not otherwise afford.
“低碳經濟是主流思想。”她說,另外與它的競爭對手相比,中央集權迅速決策和執行對中國的發展有幫助。
"A low-carbon economy is mainstream thinking, " she said, adding that Chinese development was helped by swifter centralized decision-making compared with its rivals.
低碳技術的開發和部署將成為一個關鍵問題.
the development and deployment of low-carbon technologies will be a key issue
幫你摘抄了一點!
4.關于環境保護減少二氧化碳排放的英文資料
OVERWHELMING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT CO2 EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL FUELS HAVEcaused the climate to change, and a dramatic reduction of these emissions is essential toreduce the risk of future devastating effects. On the other hand, access to energy is the basisof much of the current and future prosperity of the world. Eighty percent of this energy isderived from fossil fuel. The world has abundant fossil fuel reserves, particularly coal. TheUnited States possesses one-quarter of the known coal supply, and the United States, Russia,China, and India account for two-thirds of the reserves. Coal accounts for roughly 25% ofthe world energy supply and 40% of the carbon emissions.* It is highly unlikely that any ofthese countries will turn their back on coal any time soon, and for this reason, the capture andstorage of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power plants must be aggressively * special issue of Science discusses the potential role of carbon capture and sequestration(CCS) in reducing CO2 emissions. The scale of CCS needed to make a signifi cantdent in worldwide carbon emissions is staggering. Roughly 6 billionmetric tons of coal are used each year, producing 18 billion tonsof CO2. In contrast, we now sequester a few million metric tons ofCO2 per year. At geological storage densities of CO2 (~0.6 kg/m3),underground sequestration will require a storage volume of 30,000km3/year. This may be suffi cient storage capacity, but more testing isrequired to demonstrate such capacity and * should pursue a range of options for new coal-fi red power plants(such as coal gasifi cation, burning coal in an oxygen atmosphere, orpostcombustion capture) to determine the most cost-effective approachto burn fuel and reduce the total amount of CO2 emitted. No matterwhich technology ultimately proves best for new plants, we will stillneed to retrofi t existing plants and new plants that will be built beforeCCS is routinely deployed. Each new 1-gigawatt coal plant is a billiondollarinvestment and, once built, will be used for *tes of CCS costs vary considerably, but experience with other pollution controltechnologies such as the scrubbing of SO2 and NOx show that costs can be considerablylower than initial estimates. Furthermore, new ideas are now being explored, such as moreeffi cient, lower-temperature catalytic conversion of coal to hydrogen and methane, CO2capture based on phase separation, and polygeneration (production of variable mixtures ofelectricity, methane, liquid fuel, and ammonia). In the natural world, sequestration of CO2occurs through photosynthesis, calcifi cation of CO2 by phytoplankton, and mineralizationin ground root systems. Can we enhance natural processes (“reforestation plus”) or drawinspiration from nature as a starting point for artifi cial capture? Similarly, nature providesproof that the energy penalty for releasing adsorbed CO2 in postcombustion capture can bedecreased: Through carbonic anhydrases, our blood captures CO2 created by cell metabolismand releases it in the lungs with no enthalpic energy * support of CCS R&D is essential, and for this reason, $3.4 billion of AmericanRecovery and Reinvestment Act money is being invested by the U.S. Department of Energy(DOE) in CCS R&D. The DOE is also supporting the testing of CO2 sequestration in sevendifferent U.S. geologic formations. To accelerate global dissemination of CCS technologyand expertise, international collaborations are essential. The G-8 leaders called for at least20 CCS projects by 2010. In July, I announced a new U.S.–China Clean Energy ResearchCenter that will facilitate joint research in several areas, including CCS. Intellectual propertydeveloped jointly will be shared between our * are many hurdles to making CCS a reality, but none appear insurmountable. TheDOE goal is to support R&D, as well as pilot CCS projects so that widespread deployment ofCCS can begin in 8 to 10 years. This is an aggressive goal, but the climate problem compels usto act with fi erce urgency.。