華閱文章網1.一個簡單的英語辯論題 幫幫忙
學好地理不用到那個國家去
we dont have to really go to the certain country if we want to learn the geography well, there is a world of geographic material out there!we can watch travek channels, read geography books, browse on internet。.why should we spend a lot of money to go to a certain country when we can sit at home and enjoy the advanced information resource comfortably at home?
學好地理需要到那個國家去
there are materials about the geography of a country, which is absolutely true, but,what we should concern more is that there is culture and history and more important, the direct experience from a real trip to the *g provides us better understanding of a country than going there, we can actually see the country, talk to the people, feel another kind of life-- the knowledge comes directly from your experience always impresses you the most,thats something really counts!
2.求一篇短的英語辯論文,辯論題目自擬
觀點）Mobile phones are the main invention of modern technology. They are completely part of our daily life If we look at our society, we can see that all kinds of people are using mobile phones. they have many advantages, * main advantage of mobile phones is that we can use them anytime and anywhere, so they can use one for an emergency緊急時刻）.
* is very easy to send messages to your * phones can make people keep intimacy in spite of long distance.
* phones are turning the world into a small vilage where we can communicate with each other easily and simply
I think middle school students should be allowed to bring the cell phone. *e in the modern sociaty,there're a lot of trouble that you may get * you get into trouble,you need to have a conversation with your friends or your parents * you need a cell phone. 5.
if you have something important and you must tell somebody right away,you need a cell phone. 、、、、Then somebody may say that if you have a cell phone,you will play it in * this time,you can say like this:If there's bug in an apple,you can't say that there're bugs in every *'s true that there're one or two people liay it in the class,but it doesn't mean that everyone plays it in *'re only a few people play * can't say that
students shouldn't bring cell phone because of a few people,right? AND,1 2
In the future ,everyone can't stop harmful things to * we should improve self control at present ,instead of protecting us from all the harmful influence by the parents.
3.英語辯論的話題,簡單而且有話可說的
老年人的經驗不是世界上最大的財富
* world is developing quickly,quite a lot of old peaple's experiences are useless now. For example , you need to go to city A,and your grandpa tell you immdiately that you can take bus B and some orther informationg that he thinks them as the best way to * he don't kown there is a new way can take you to A * then which way you wound those ?So ,how can it become the greatest world wealth.
*ody is different from * everyone's life road is different from orthers'.So,old people's ways are different from * get their esperiences from their life * how can we use their experience in our way?So how can it be the greatest wealth?
* obey experiences makes mistakes. this stops us from thinking of our own ways to solve * make us stupid.
4.英語辯論賽的辯論詞
Firsty,almost everybody assumes that our life cannot be happy without *tely,for our * and girls have different views on a same thing .So it's good for our study to make friends with each * key point is one can hardly do a job in a quick way ,otherwise,we cooperate with many people .
secondly,as an old saying goes:“A hedge between keeps the friendship green",if we can command the limitation between heterosexual friendship ,we surely can benefit from it.
As far as i am concerned,the relationship between boys and girls is beneficial for the growth of * i stand for this point.
Thirdly,it is well known that different people have different opinions,what's more,some experts once said tha heterosexual people have different ideas ,if they communicate with each other ,meanwhile they cooperate with each other ,things will turn easier and easier……
怎么沒采用啊？回答的不好嗎？我覺得我的回答算是簡單的了……
5.英語辯論稿的開頭經常用到的一些句子
正一
Hello everyone. In the first place, we indicate our position: College is a transitional period in our life. We are supposed to adapt to the society and amativeness is an important part of it. We hold the view that amativeness among the college students does more good than harm.
The first reason: A College is a society in miniature. Anything reasonable is allowed to happen here, so it's no wrong to fall in love
Furthermore, it can build up our sense of responsibility. When two people fall in love, they'll learn to care, to be lenient and to take on responsibility gradually. Besides, it contributes to our * are such essential qualities and act as preparation for our future life and work.
What's more, it will be a memorable experience and add a sweet flavor to our life. It will be the most colorful period of our life. Anytime we look back upon it, we will always feel very eudemonic
In a word, love on campus is beneficial.
反一：
I think rather differently. Amativeness among college students does more harm than good. We hold this view basing on the following reasons:
First of all, it affects our studies. The students in love often spend much time in dating, even when taking tutorial classes, they are still chatting. Most of the time they will stay together, but what's the time for studying?Secondly, it will cost you much money. During our college life, it's our parents who pay for both our living and schooling. We are not independent in economy. Think about it,How much of your parents' sweat can purchase you the momentary sweetness of insane love
Last, when two students fall in love, they'll lose the enthusiasm in group activities to some extent. It will lead to a distance with the classmates, and do harm to the harmony of the collective.
All in all, we stick to the point above.
6.求一篇英語辯論賽的文章
* is a simply waste of life. Imagine sitting in a room and staring at a blank wall. After a while you would probably get bored and starting thinking of something to *ng TV has the same (unhealthy) physical effects but it has different mental effects. Television 'de-borifies' you but you gain nothing from it. You could watch an educational program (good ones are rare) but you would still gain less than by reading a book about the subject for the same amount of time. TV stops you thinking about how much older you were when you started watching the * a relaxation method, looking at a blank screen is just as good, at least you could imagine something!TV is useful for selling stuff (inc. politics) and as a contraceptive, but has few other uses apart from jobs for people who work on the programs or make the sets. A major sporting or live event is probably the best use for TV, but on balance it's an anti-social machine. It's a communication device that encourages people not to communicate. Any country that banned TV would see an instant increase in productivity and probably a decrease in anti-social * is more addictive than smoking, I know more people that have quit smoking than TV. Most people in poor countries who haven't got one wish they had one. Even I can't resist watching it despite this passionate argument, but sometimes I dream of piling dynamite at the base of every transmitter in Britain and pushing the *ionally there's something interesting on. Simpsons, Futurama, Family Guy, Adult Swim, these all provide much needed laughter and entertainment. Most of TV really is an utter waste of time though, and I couldn't imagine spending more than an hour a day watching it. I also have a terrible habit of losing interest during commercial breaks and going to do something else instead. Speaking of commercials, tv advertising seems to have really gone downhill. Commercials these days don't even attempt to inform you about the product and instead rely entirely on gimmicks. Not only do you have to watch 5 minutes of advertising for every 10 minutes of programming, the advertising manages to be entirely devoid of content. I'll usually leave the room to get a snack (or give up on watching entirely) after the first 30 seconds of a commercial break since there's nothing there to focus on. Instead of 30 seconds of information on how a product can benefit me, commercials now result to jokes and do their best to stand out by being "different". The primary purpose seems to be get the viewer to watch the ad rather than having the ad say anything useful. I'm having trouble describing the ads because there really is nothing there. They are empty. I can stare at an ad and I am not always sure what it's advertising, and associating the product with interruption of my tv show is not making me want to buy it. Maybe this is how things are sold on tv these days, but I'm starting to have doubts. The shopping channels still seem to have the right idea. The products are questionable at best, but the commercials go to great length to focus on the product and to make the viewer desire it. Lately my buying decisions have been influenced more by internet banner ads (not the punch the monkey style) than they have by tv. Sorry for going into rant mode a bit, but I think the whole model that TV runs off of is slowly becoming outdated. I would watch a lot more TV if it was a pay per view or monthly ad-free subscription, and I could simply select the shows I want to watch and when. Basically the same type of system as legal music downloads, including the ability to store the show so I don't have to pay multiple times to watch the same episode (assuming a pay per view system). This would also be a terrific way of gauging a show's true popularity. Gems like Family Guy (Family Guy DVD sales are proof the show IS quite popular!) and Futurama would no longer be killed off because of an outdated ratings system and lack of good time slots.。
7.英文辯論 評委常用的句子
Usage of English:
The student was careful in using proper tense and correct grammar, and made very few mistakes.
The student's English left a lot to be desired. At times it was hard to understand what he was trying to say.
Speaking style:
The student had a good speaking style. He was polite but firm, and never raised the voice.
Shouting is not a way to win a debate. This student constantly interrupted other people and shouted over others.
Substance:
Student A seemed better prepared and made better use of specific facts than his opponent.
He presented his case with more confidence and clarity.
The student made poor use of evidence. The facts often did not support his argument.
Persuasiveness:
He organized arguments in a persuasive manner, and made a compelling case for his side.
This student perhaps needed to do a better job of answering a question at the back of the listeners' minds: (fill in your question)?
Logic:
The logic of the argument was clear.
There was no logical connection between two parts of the argument.
The logic was confused.
Overall, I think he did an excellent job.
Overall, he gave a better presentation.
Overall, I think he could have done better.
Overall, I judge his performance to be unsatisfactory.